San Mateo projects a $17 million general fund deficit for the upcoming fiscal year, which the city attributes to rising operating costs and uncertain revenue streams, especially from the state.
The budget plan shows a $290 million operating budget, most of that coming from the general fund, and $66 million for capital projects.
The city’s overall revenue is projected to decrease for the 2026-27 fiscal year, which starts next month, in large part due to vehicle license fee revenue. The removed funding source is technically a reimbursement the state gives the county and is based on a complicated formula that takes into account vehicle license fee revenue and school districts in each county. The funds are at the center of a lawsuit against the state, as it hasn’t been reimbursing San Mateo County jurisdictions.
Other income sources, however, are doing well.
“In general most of our revenues are growing,” Finance Director Abby Veeser said during the City Council meeting, citing steady property tax growth. Sales tax revenue is seeing slower growth but is increasing nonetheless, she added.
The projected deficit is higher than the anticipated shortfall for the current fiscal year. Revenue is expected to decrease by about $2 million next fiscal year, or 1%. The bulk of the city’s income comes from property and sales tax, with property transfer tax estimated to be $9 million.
Expenses are expected to increase by about 1.7%, according to the presentation. Most of the increases come from rising insurance premiums, contracted services and a $14 million payment toward the city’s unfunded pension liability, the staff report said.
The city plans to use its reserve fund and freeze hiring for 10 vacant positions to help narrow the financial gap. The council has also been considering adding a local quarter-cent sales tax to the November ballot.
"I do support exploring a quarter-cent sales tax just because I believe in protecting public safety and maintaining our parks and preserving our libraries and continuing to invest in the infrastructure and the core services," Councilmember Danielle Cwirko-Godycki said during the meeting.
The city’s 2026-27 capital budget is $66.3 million and nearly $350 million for the five-year plan. The plan lays out some of the city’s largest near-term infrastructure projects, including the King Recreation and Swim Center design, stormwater improvements and Fire Station 27 pre-construction work.
(650) 344-5200 ext. 102
Daily Journal staff
{{description}}
Email notifications are only sent once a day, and only if there are new matching items.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Join the San Mateo Daily Journal in Fiesta Hall at the Community Expo at the San Mateo County Fair! Read moreSan Mateo Community Expo at the Fair
Join New York Times bestselling author Caroline Paul for a lively discussion of her book Tou… Read moreBook Club with Author Caroline Paul
CA Is Burning said:
CA Is Burning said:
Fewer democrats would be quite helpful
Dirk van Ulden said:
Success! An email has been sent to with a link to confirm list signup.
Error! There was an error processing your request.
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(2) comments
Folks, here we have more evidence your money is being transferred to ever-increasing salaries, pensions, and benefits. Note that over 80% of this $17 million deficit is being sent to the city’s unfunded pension liability, which means that city union raises were handed out like candy when the city knew these costs were unsustainable. And which also means, taxpayers are not receiving anything for this $14 million. Don’t be surprised when the city wants to up the “fear” factor to a projected $50 million deficit, without telling us that over $40 million to be used toward the city’s unfunded pension liability. Regardless, vote NO on any tax measures supporting union labor. Based on common sense, we know sooner or later, most, if not all, these tax proceeds will be transferred to union pockets with no benefit to taxpayers at large.
Yes, Terence ! Thanks for posting this.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.