As a bookseller, I’m always on the lookout for titles that feature the wonderful diversity of the types of people with whom we share the planet.
Members of our industry, publishers, authors, illustrators, reviewers, librarians and booksellers, believe that books can be “windows, mirrors and sliding glass doors” for those who discover and read them. That phrase was coined by Dr. Rudine Sims Bishop in 1990 to describe how literature reflects, reveals and transports readers. Diverse books, according to Bishop’s thinking, should act as mirrors reflecting a reader’s own identity, windows offering views into other lives, and sliding glass doors allowing readers to enter new worlds.
Why, some would ask, do we need to concern ourselves with such things? I and many others would say that diversity in literature is one of the keys to creating a more compassionate, empathetic and peaceful world. Yeah, that’s woke.
If you’re 50 or older, think back to your childhood experiences reading. If you’re white, heterosexual and cisgender, there were lots of mirrors. Otherwise… not so much. I’ve written before about Mildred Pitts Walter, a Black woman born in 1922 in Louisiana, who spoke out at a 1960s book conference about the lack of children’s books featuring African-American characters. Some in the audience booed her and that inspired her to start writing her own books, eventually winning recognition including the Coretta Scott King and Jane Addams Children’s Book Awards. Her books weren’t just critically well received, they also sold well, which inspired publishers to take more chances with diverse authors, illustrators and characters. We were the booksellers for a talk by Mildred about her autobiography, “Something Inside So Strong.” She’s awesome!
While there’s been progress on getting diversity in literature, diverse readers know that much more work has been needed and still is. Last decade, recognizing that we still had a long way to go in the industry, the hashtag “We Need Diverse Books” went viral and an organization was launched with that name. They’ve done incredible work transforming bookshelves and communities. Visit them at diversebooks.org.
Recommended for you
Sadly, other forces have been at work trying to keep diverse books off library shelves, out of schools and even out of bookstores. PEN America tracks book banning across the country and reports on the “most banned books” annually. Attempts to ban books have skyrocketed in the last few years, with 4,235 unique titles being challenged in 2025. Books representing the lived experiences of LGBTQIA+ and Black people were the most commonly challenged.
Moms for Liberty is one of the most active organizations in the country challenging books. Funny, it seems oxymoronic for an organization with the word “liberty” in its name to be banning books. Fortunately, PEN America, the American Library Association, the American Booksellers Association, along with publishers and authors, have been successfully fighting book bans, winning many court and legislative battles, but not all.
Given the continuing diversification of the United States, I hope that books, films, plays, and all ways we see each other continue to evolve to better represent us all. Given that many in the MAGA movement perceive any policies and programs specifically promoting diversity to be discrimination against white, heterosexual, cisgender people, it has become quite a battle. The same is true for trying to have more diverse representation in government. Before the Voting Rights Act of 1965, there were only around 100 Black elected officials in the country. Today there are over 10,000, with 62 in Congress. That progress was dealt a severe blow on April 29 when the Supreme Court struck down a Louisiana congressional map that included a majority-Black district, with their governor quickly halting an ongoing election to redistrict. Seizing the opportunity, Tennessee’s Legislature immediately moved to break up Memphis, a majority-Black (and Democratic party stronghold) city, into three new districts where Republicans would dominate each district.
Nationwide, gerrymandering has been wild since the president, hoping to avoid a Democratic landslide in the congressional midterms, asked Texas to redistrict to increase the number of likely-to-win Republican Party seats. Other states, like California, have similarly redistricted to increase potential wins for the Democratic Party. The state of play seems to be that it is OK to split up districts based on party advantage, though the impact on racial representation is very clear. Time will tell whether we see much less diversity in government based on all of this redistricting.
Will we the people of the United States move backwards in the coming months and years, reversing the gains diverse populations have made? Perhaps. Or, perhaps a massive voter uprising starting with the midterms in November will make it clear that despite gerrymandering, the majority of Americans embrace our windows, mirrors, and sliding glass doors. That, my friends, is up to us. Organize! Vote!
Craig Wiesner is the co-owner of Reach And Teach, a book, toy and cultural gift shop on San Carlos Avenue in San Carlos. Follow Craig: craigwiesner.bsky.social.
Oh Craig, where do I even start this morning with your column of misinformation.
The myth of conservative "book banning" is so 2022. I will repeat: curating a school library for age appropriate content with literary value is not "banning".
It is actually liberals who challenge books with racial themes such as To Kill a Mockingbird ("White Savior") or Huck Finn ("N" word). Just saying that conservatives are trying to "ban" books with black characters doesn't make it true.
The books that groups like Moms for Liberty want removed from elementary and middle school classrooms are usually extremely sexual and not appropriate for young kids. We aren't talking books with a gay character done sensitively.
Here's a local example: 3 years ago for "Pride" month my son came home from Burlingame Intermediate School and told me about a book displayed in the library called "This Book is Gay". That book contained GRAPHIC descriptions and drawings of sex acts and even suggested that gay kids use hook up apps to meet other gay people. Even the author recommended it only for older teens, not 11-14 year old middle schoolers. To her credit, when I sent her pages from the book then principal Erica Gilbert agreed this book was inappropriate for a middle school library and quietly removed it. Of course any parent who wanted to have a nightly read-aloud with their kids could find this book on Amazon or public libraries, yet to Craig Wiesner this is an evil "book Ban"!
Of course being a Craig column we also have a completely unrelated discussion about redistricting with the odd and frankly racist idea that a black representative can only be elected in a majority black district. How in the world did we get President Obama, or many black elected officials locally (Lisa Gaulthier on BOS now) in a county that is only 2% black?
Since MichKosk has addressed the book banning thing, I’ll concentrate on Mr. Wiesner’s unrelated redistricting thing.
Here we go again… Mr. Wiesner attempting to blame Republicans when Democrats have been gerrymandering for a while. It doesn’t feel so good, Mr. Wiesner, when the shoe is on the other foot, does it? When the other side begins playing by the rules you’ve set. Imagine if Newsom didn’t start the redistricting war in trying to nullify Texas’s redistricting effort (in response to a DOJ report). Instead of a smaller Republican seat advantage, Newsom has increased the potential Republican seat advantage to double digits, if reports come to fruition. I not surprised Mr. Wiesner would prefer we move backward and increase division in our country. After all, Democrats are the party of the KKK and Jim Crow laws. Regardless, Mr. Wiesner is correct in one respect. Organize and vote for Republican candidates who put America first and not Democrat candidates who put the welfare of criminals and terrorists over the American people.
Hey Craig - is Hitler's Mein Kampf included? "diversity in literature is one of the keys to creating a more compassionate, empathetic and peaceful world. Yeah, that’s woke."
Craig, your attempt at throwing Harry Potter’s cloak of invisibility over your support for filth, pornographers and pedophilia should be your last stand.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(5) comments
Oh Craig, where do I even start this morning with your column of misinformation.
The myth of conservative "book banning" is so 2022. I will repeat: curating a school library for age appropriate content with literary value is not "banning".
It is actually liberals who challenge books with racial themes such as To Kill a Mockingbird ("White Savior") or Huck Finn ("N" word). Just saying that conservatives are trying to "ban" books with black characters doesn't make it true.
The books that groups like Moms for Liberty want removed from elementary and middle school classrooms are usually extremely sexual and not appropriate for young kids. We aren't talking books with a gay character done sensitively.
Here's a local example: 3 years ago for "Pride" month my son came home from Burlingame Intermediate School and told me about a book displayed in the library called "This Book is Gay". That book contained GRAPHIC descriptions and drawings of sex acts and even suggested that gay kids use hook up apps to meet other gay people. Even the author recommended it only for older teens, not 11-14 year old middle schoolers. To her credit, when I sent her pages from the book then principal Erica Gilbert agreed this book was inappropriate for a middle school library and quietly removed it. Of course any parent who wanted to have a nightly read-aloud with their kids could find this book on Amazon or public libraries, yet to Craig Wiesner this is an evil "book Ban"!
Of course being a Craig column we also have a completely unrelated discussion about redistricting with the odd and frankly racist idea that a black representative can only be elected in a majority black district. How in the world did we get President Obama, or many black elected officials locally (Lisa Gaulthier on BOS now) in a county that is only 2% black?
Since MichKosk has addressed the book banning thing, I’ll concentrate on Mr. Wiesner’s unrelated redistricting thing.
Here we go again… Mr. Wiesner attempting to blame Republicans when Democrats have been gerrymandering for a while. It doesn’t feel so good, Mr. Wiesner, when the shoe is on the other foot, does it? When the other side begins playing by the rules you’ve set. Imagine if Newsom didn’t start the redistricting war in trying to nullify Texas’s redistricting effort (in response to a DOJ report). Instead of a smaller Republican seat advantage, Newsom has increased the potential Republican seat advantage to double digits, if reports come to fruition. I not surprised Mr. Wiesner would prefer we move backward and increase division in our country. After all, Democrats are the party of the KKK and Jim Crow laws. Regardless, Mr. Wiesner is correct in one respect. Organize and vote for Republican candidates who put America first and not Democrat candidates who put the welfare of criminals and terrorists over the American people.
Hey Craig - is Hitler's Mein Kampf included? "diversity in literature is one of the keys to creating a more compassionate, empathetic and peaceful world. Yeah, that’s woke."
Ban the Bible? Been done. Odd it's not mentioned.
Craig, your attempt at throwing Harry Potter’s cloak of invisibility over your support for filth, pornographers and pedophilia should be your last stand.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.