A draft ordinance related to electric micromobility devices was discussed by the Board of Supervisors Tuesday at length, in a study session about how the county can approach a growing epidemic of illegal transportation devices that are putting lives at risk. 

After an ordinance was initially proposed by supervisors Jackie Speier and Ray Mueller in March, further study was deemed necessary on the topic. For over two hours on Tuesday, professionals, advocates, county employees and supervisors discussed the complex topic that touches upon sustainability, accessibility and public safety at once. 

Recommended for you

ana@smdailyjournal.com

(65) 344-5200 ext. 106

Recommended for you

(3) comments

joebob91

Thanks for speaking out, Dylan!!!! It is great that kids are voicing their opinions on this issue : )

joebob91

Thank you to the Board of Supervisors for holding this study session and giving this complex subject the detailed discussion that it deserves. I hope that we are able to gather more data on whether e-motos (not e-bikes) are the real problem here.

easygerd

Joebob, there was absolutely no complexity in this subject BEFORE Bay Area Democrats inserted that complexity.

- Bush administration: <1hp is a "low speed electric bicycle" and to be regulated and enforced like a regular bicycle. (nickname: e-bike)

- Trump administration: <1hp is an ADA-relevant and equity device and ESPECIALLY if it also has a throttle and can go 28mph.

- EVERYTHING more powerful than 1hp is to be treated and enforced like a moped or motorcycle. Every single law enforcement agency in America could now enforce this.

Then our Bay Area Democrats "invented" another unnecessary class system and started to attack the throttle, the speed, the horsepower, the ADA relevance from all sides.

-MidPen doesn't like the ADA throttle.

-Palo Alto bans all e-bikes from their old garbage dump grassland.

-Menlo Park doesn't want them at schools.

-HMB tried to ban them from the coastal trails.

-Foster City keeps letting kids on e-bikes be run over by cars with no repercussions for the drivers.

Basically anyone reliant on an e-bike needs three different depending on where they want to ride it.

And no law enforcement officer wants to touch that mess, because no one knows who is at fault of which local regulation.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here