South San Francisco hopes to spur movement on a massive, long-awaited housing development — which includes many affordable units — after one of the developers withdrew from the project and financing remains tenuous.
The project is located at 1051 Mission Road and plans to include 800 housing units, 158 of which would be considered below market rate. The development would also include a child care center, center for local businesses and vehicle bridge over Colma Creek.
“This is essentially a new neighborhood,” Community Development Director Nell Selander said during the meeting April 16. “Not only does it include the new housing development but also quite a bit of infrastructure.”
But since the project was approved back in 2019, it still hasn’t broken ground, and the city hopes to amend an agreement that could potentially allow developers to do so in the next year and a half.
Some of the delay was due to preparation work on the site itself.
“One of the big contingencies in this project was removing the site from the 100-year floodplain which really [didn’t allow] for any residential development there,” Selander said. “It took a couple years … now the property really can be developed easily for housing.”
Recommended for you
However, other financing challenges — including a lack of grant funding and economic challenges that have made lending conditions difficult in the last couple years — have caused further delays. BRIDGE Housing, the original developer for the affordable housing portion of the project, withdrew its participation, meaning the current developer, L37, will need to secure another partner.
“A lot of progress has been made, but you still don't see any housing coming out of the ground, and the economic conditions really present substantial barriers to the project,” Selander said.
To help speed up the project, the Planning Commission agreed with staff recommendations to amend the development agreement that would allow the city to redirect development impact fees toward the affordable housing part of the project if other funding sources fall through, waives additional impact fees for the affordable housing component and extends the development agreement deadline to the end of 2032. It was originally set to expire at the end of 2029.
“We’ve been trying since approvals to get this thing funded,” L37 Managing Partner Eric Tao said during the commission meeting. “We’ve been scrambling to find new investments but meanwhile … we’ve been advancing the project, spending money to get the designs done to figure out how we can make this more affordable, cost-wise.”
Commissioners supported the amendments, which will ultimately go before the City Council at the end of April.
“This has been a long time coming,” Commissioner John Baker said during the meeting. “But I am pleased to see we are making some progress here."
Folks, more evidence affordable housing cannot be built affordably and must be subsidized by others. It is apparent to me that SSF is attempting to continue saddling developers with extra fees. Sure, forfeiting fees for the affordable housing “part” are a start but why not forfeit fees for all units? Instead, SSF would rather keep construction from beginning and allow building costs and fees to continue increasing. I guess housing isn’t really a big concern in SSF.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
Folks, more evidence affordable housing cannot be built affordably and must be subsidized by others. It is apparent to me that SSF is attempting to continue saddling developers with extra fees. Sure, forfeiting fees for the affordable housing “part” are a start but why not forfeit fees for all units? Instead, SSF would rather keep construction from beginning and allow building costs and fees to continue increasing. I guess housing isn’t really a big concern in SSF.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.