A program providing services for students with intensive educational support service needs is closing its doors at Burlingame High School, with a sudden decision that will relocate students to two other campuses for the next school year.
Bay Academy serves special needs students, and establishes access to general education electives and classes with a home base within one of two classrooms dedicated to the population. Students range in abilities; some are higher-function students with autism spectrum disorder and others have epilepsy or are nonverbal.
Over spring break in the San Mateo Union High School District, parents of the 25-or-so students enrolled in Bay Academy at Burlingame High School received a phone call stating that the program would close and their student would be sent to either Mills or Hillsdale high school next year where the academy program also exists. One parent received the news left on a voicemail.
While the district has assured parents that it is “not a change of services, just a change of placement,” parents are frustrated that a decision was made for them and without any consultation.
“Basically, with a simple phone call, my son’s future that we had planned for him is destroyed,” Nina Berkovits said.
The district has been planning the relocation of Burlingame’s Bay Academy students since February, and it was a decision made “to strengthen and expand the program to better support students,” Superintendent Randall Booker said in a statement.
“By placing the Burlingame-based classes on campuses that already host multiple Bay Academy classrooms, we will create more robust, connected program sites,” Booker said.
The relocation will not affect students’ educational placement or services, Booker said. Teachers and instructional assistants are also generally moving alongside students, and whether students were moved to Mills or Hillsdale high schools was a decision “based on multiple factors” he said.
Booker said the district has heard concerns from families affected and has engaged in outreach, but parents said communication and answers to questions has been sparse since the April 1 phone call over spring break.
Parent concerns
While Hilda Delgadillo is frustrated that her son, Angelo, has to move schools — after she transferred him into Burlingame schools during middle school from San Bruno out of frustration with their special education programs — she is most upset about the lack of communication and support she’s received since the news broke.
“It’s about how they came across just dropping the news, and when we have questions, they don’t have any answers for us,” Delgadillo said.
While the Bay Academy program may function similarly at the other campuses, parents expressed concern about interrupting their students’ familiarity with a campus that took time to which to acclimate, and interfering with the community they’ve found.
Berkovits’ son, Zane, has autism and is a freshman at Burlingame High School enrolled in the Bay Academy program. He’s highly involved in sports, playing for the tennis team and working as equipment management for varsity teams.
He’s a part of the school’s Best Buddies Club, which partners general education students with special needs students to develop friendships and community. Zane’s older brother, who is now in college, actually started the program at Burlingame High years ago, and his older sister was also involved during her tenure at the school.
Berkovits and her family have lived in Burlingame for 17 years. She works on Burlingame Avenue, where Zane has gained confidence to walk toward after school, and where life skills lessons are even taught to Bay Academy students.
Jenna Papapietro’s son is also a freshman at Burlingame High School in the Bay Academy program. He was born with down syndrome and is diagnosed autistic, and the educational program has been a great resource, Papapietro said.
When Papapietro first received the news, she was fine with the decision, happy that her son would be moved alongside his classmates, teacher and aides. But days went by and she realized the community he would lose by going to another school, away from the students he’s grown alongside.
Papapietro’s son has grown up in Burlingame schools, around the same general education students his whole life. When he’s walking on Burlingame Avenue, students recognize him and say “hi” and they cheer him on at school dances where he’ll find himself in the middle of a group breakdancing.
When Papapietro and her older brother with special needs were in high school, “things were very different back then” and she worried her son may have a similar experience, but he’s found support among his peers.
“They recognize him, and that really warms my heart,” Papapietro said. “I’ve been so happy he’s been accepted.”
While Bay Academy students at Burlingame High School may transfer to a different campus largely alongside their peers in the program, they’ll lose out on the friendships they’ve established among general education students, parents said.
Recommended for you
To Jennifer Parker, a mom of a Bay Academy student, the act of moving kids with special needs from their neighborhood school to another campus feels “very ableist.”
“I believe inclusion is meant to be in your own community, not just any community,” Parker said. “These students are not plug and play.”
Parker’s son, Lou, has severe epilepsy and his physical proximity is a critical concern of hers. He’s currently a freshman at Burlingame High School in the Bay Academy program, and was told he would be transferred to Mills High School.
Burlingame High School is relatively central in San Mateo Union High School District’s boundaries. Mills is about 3 miles north, and Hillsdale is the southernmost school within the bounds, between a 6- and 9-mile drive away.
The move was defended by the district as a “student-centric decision,” according to Parker.
Program goals
In an email response to a concerned resident, Booker said “the goal is to strengthen program coherence, increase access to services, and better support students in meeting program goals and learning outcomes.” This includes coursework for the Alternative Diploma pathway that grants eligible students with disabilities the chance to earn a regular high school diploma.
The move, and consolidation of classes at the two other campus would give students a school day that “can mimic a typical high schooler’s day, with different teachers for different subjects,” and more variety, Parker said.
“Well, my son is not a typical high schooler,” Parker said. “Transitions are hard for him and I actually think he benefits from having one teacher.”
Parker said she had concerns about the academic success of her son, Lou, as a result of the move, even if the decision was made with good intentions.
For at least the first semester, Lou will only be focused on readjusting to a new environment, and will “absolutely spend 100% of his effort just trying to get his feet under him.” The other parents expressed a similar concern, stating it took an entire year for their student to get used to Burlingame High School’s campus as well.
Enrollment challenges?
Currently at Burlingame High School, there are two Bay Academy classrooms taught by two teachers.
Concerns were raised by parents that the closure of the two Bay Academy classrooms may have been made based on enrollment challenges at Burlingame High, a highly-impacted school with a lengthy waitlist.
Booker said the Bay Academy move was a decision “made independent of any space considerations at Burlingame” and was not to create classroom space for general education students.
Parents aren’t so sure that’s the truth.
“That’s prime real estate at Burlingame, they’re not going to just leave those empty, they’re going to fill those,” Berkovits said. “It’s discriminatory.”
Many emails from parents, alumni and community member have been sent to the district raising concerns over the site move, and many intend to show up to the district’s Board of Trustees meeting April 16.
Since comments will likely be made during the public comment portion of the meeting, district trustees and staff will be limited on their ability to respond, but board President Teri Chavez said she’s looking forward to listening to all the concerns.
“I think our community members have important points to make,” Chavez said. “[Booker] felt it was a move that was necessary for the district. … I would be willing to explore any option or alternative if there is one.”
To Delgadillo, Angelo’s mom, speaking in front of the board and district staff will be emotional, but a necessary fight on behalf of her son. Not unfamiliar with pointing out the flaws of special education programs in public school districts, Delgadillo said she has to speak up.
“My kid, he can’t communicate, I’m his voice,” Delgadillo said. “Not only am I his parent, I’m his voice. These kids are already having a hard life as it is, and they’re not making is easier.”

(3) comments
Anger and Trauma- An attack upon the BHS Bay Academy Parents
-Parents and school staff should NEVER be fearful of speaking out about corruption and negligence. Nor should they expect retaliation for their actions.
(Video Clip-Set to the Bay Parents Public Comments)
https://www.youtube.com/live/tZfkdDf2CqQ?si=W335_mkN5UtIhj8P&t=2810
The public should watch the video clip of the speakers for two reasons:
A. The power and compassion of community. The Bay Academy has inspired a loving and caring community of students. The Buddies Program, engaging mainstream students and Bay Academy students (created at many schools), is a “legacy” club, self-perpetuating each year as student WANT to be part of and further the positive environmental shift these programs.
B. Also…. Watch the parents address the uninformed SMUHSD Trustees regarding the “planned” closure of the highly innovative BHS Bay Academy program which has become a safe haven for their children, linked to their community.
Embarrassment #1- Superintendent Booker, using his status and position, used the opening of the meeting to “jump ahead” of the parents to addressed the “issue” prior to the public comment period. Not only are the parents BLOCKED from any counter maneuver, but there was also NO AGENDA item for the parents to speak to, yet Superintendent Booker “manifested” a speaking period for HIMSELF to create a “buffer” for his job as the Trustees would soon learn about the trauma and anxiety caused by his negligence. As one parent made a comment to the effect of, “there is an agenda item tonight to discuss the resurfacing of the BHS Tennis Courts, but nothing about the destruction of this program for our children,” the most vulnerable children in the District.
The BHS Bay Academy Parents are peole who spend 24/7 concerned about the care and well-being of the most vulnerable children in the SMUHSD. As stated in the SMDJ article, the children cannot speak for or defend themselves, they depend upon their parents for this protection.
In his abrupt statement, Booker’s attempted to inoculate his failures by disclosing the District’s actions as beyond “poorly planned and executed.” These are acts of negligence which have impacted these parents with extreme anxiety, trauma, and a continued fear of what is going to happen next to their children. Booker then closed his abrupt comments by adding, “even a well planned and executed delivery would not have changed the minds of these parents.”
This is not the first, nor will it be the last act of embarrassment and humiliation by this SMUHSD administration and tolerated by the Trustees. This is a continuing circus parade of highly paid public-school leaders continue to fail Civil Rights 101, yes still cashing a $400,000 paycheck.
The SMUHSD stated process of complete failure and inability to lead or communicate.
Superintendent Booker stated to the Bay Academy parents:
(1) The closure of the program solves no definable problem at BHS, and he has no plan in processing for the closure of the program.
(2) The poor communication was planned, and not a failure The parents of students of a protected class under civil rights law, received a phone call or voice message during Spring Break, on April 1, stating (not explaining) their vulnerable children should be physically moved from a school site and program that has become part of their identity.
(3) Parents report the BHS Principal, teachers, and staff had no information on the closure of the program or “move.” Statement of staff as “fearful” of commenting on the process—FEARFUL.
(4) When school resumed, the SMUHSD then continued in its ongoing negligence, flailing to communicate to these parents, “exactly WHERE their students would attend school next year.” Parents received calls stating first a move to Hillsdale High School, only to be followed later stating, “no… Hillsdale is full, you are going to Mills.”
(4) Parents were next offered a “meeting and a site tour” of the new placement for their student, only to arrive on the campus where site staff knew NOTHING about a tour and the district office leaders were nowhere to be found on time
(5) Parents have stated via communications that the has been no planning, no communication, to engagement of students, parents, teachers, site administrators or anyone beyond Superintendent Booker and his Director of Special Education.
In the “real world” the $400,000 per year Superintendent Booker would have already been released for cause, based on known prior actions the will soon see the daylight.
Trustee Greg Land, the Burlingame Intermediate School Principal and designated district representative is silent on this issue, despite his and Mr. Booker’s many social media posts on LinkedIn regarding their “participation trophy” actions and careers.
These are real families and real people.
This is real anxiety and real trauma for both students and parents.
The Trustees cannot allow the vulnerable students of the Bay Academy to literally pay for the negligence, arrogance, and ignorance of the SMUHSD District office leadership.
The BHS Bay Academy is everything that is RIGHT about public education and the program (and its creator) should be celebrated and rewarded.
The Trustees have one path to represent the people
1. Place the closure of the Bay Academy on indefinite hold.
2. Remove Superintendent Booker and staff who continue in these extreme acts of negligence costing the SMUHSD both financial and social capital in the community.
3. The SMUHSD is one of the wealthiest public school district in the state, yet its management and stewardship are an embarrassment.
4. The Trustees are aware of pending investigations and charges of “other” violations of the law, where sitting Trustees are implicated.
Thank you for this additional information. Booker is not a leader and this is just one of a long string of examples. I have had two kids go through BHS (one current) and relationships with Bay Academy students are a positive aspect of the community there. Just terrible what was done to these families and there is no clear reason why. I hope the Board steps up and the current Bay Academy students are not forced to move. If this change has to be made, why not at least do it gradually with incoming classes instead of moving vulnerable kids from where they are comfortable with established relationships?
There is/has been an information Firewall between the administration and the Trustees. The administration is documented as withholding information from the Trustee, as seen in this embarrassment as well. The Firewall scheme was presented in the 2020 Trustee election and if Neal Kaufman had been elected, the public would not see any of these acts as he had the ethics and courage to take on the fraud. As stated by the parents, there is a concern of retaliation as they know this is a real factor. The solution- pull this decision from any future agenda until sunlight can be shown on the real intent of this move....along with "other" moves that have taken place. According to legal sources, the District's own Lozano Smith does not even endorse this move.-
"Lozano Smith, one of the leading California school-district defense firms, explicitly warns districts that California law restricts their ability to unilaterally change location despite the R.M. v. Gilbert Unified federal decision."
Who is representing the legal interests of the people and the children?
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.