Utility executives’ salaries could become tied to their companies keeping electricity rates from rising faster than inflation if new legislation introduced by state Sen. Josh Becker passes. 

Becker, D-Menlo Park, recently introduced Senate Bill 905, a major utility reform package intended to address rising electricity costs and create new standards to measure how well existing energy grids are performing.

Recommended for you

holly@smdailyjournal.com

(650) 344-5200 ext. 105

Recommended for you

(9) comments

CA Is Burning

This made me think. Perhaps US senators and congressmen should not get paid when there is not a budget, just like DHS employees. One difference though , there would be no back pay once a budget is signed for the senators and congressmen. You snooze you lose. These political games need to stop

Lou

What about the Data Centers that use electricity? How much do they increase our bills? Senator Becker, are you working on that? ......"Northern California (especially the Silicon Valley / Bay Area) — This is the dominant cluster, driven by proximity to tech companies, dense fiber networks, and high demand for low-latency compute. It accounts for the majority of the state's capacity (over 160 facilities in some counts for the broader Northern California market)."

Dirk van Ulden

This is hilarious "also makes it less likely that individuals will invest in clean energy like house electrification and electric vehicles, Becker said." The dear senator is not really addressing the true reason for our sky-high rates. Few ratepayers are aware that the utilities offer energy efficiency programs that are heavily burdened with overhead. There is also a CARE program that allows folks to self report their income level thereby getting major discounts on their utility bills. In some utility regions almost 40% of the ratepayers qualify. Who do you believe is paying for all of this? Becker is a political hack and just caters to cheap solutions for his unaware or perhaps gullible constituents. PG&E's executives run a no-risk organization, yet get compensated as if they were in a competitive space. Perhaps if PG&E, SCE and SDG&E were to return to their core responsibility instead of having to placate the politicians and practicing social engineering, our utility rates would reflect what the market dictates. Senator Beck's efforts are not even band aid.

Lou

Thanks Mr. van Ulden for pointing some of these things out. Per a search..."Over 63% of California's ratepayer-funded energy efficiency and demand response programs fail cost-effectiveness tests, meaning their benefits (like energy savings or emissions reductions) do not justify the costs passed to customers."

Dirk van Ulden

Lou - I worked at PG&E during the transition from maximizing electricity and gas sales to getting more benefits from instituting energy efficiency programs. Rule making by the CPUC made that possible and PG&E, as well as the other utilities, found this to be more lucrative than pushing gas and electricity sales. Efficiency and utility operations are mutually exclusive. On top of that, the labor unions, e.g. IBEW, are essentially running the show with full support from our legislators and the governor. Heaven help us, and don't count on Becker, he is in on it.

Lou

Mr. van Ulden - Do you have any thoughts on privatizing PG&E? I believe it has been tried, and why hasn't it succeeded? Would it be a good idea if it could be accomplished? Also, I believe many people are paying $500-800/mo. for electricity bills. Any ideas on help to lower those?

Dirk van Ulden

Lou - the best way to reduce our energy bills is to look at how utilities operate in other states. They are still based on solid engineering, customer satisfaction and competitive energy procurement. In California, we have gone off the rails since Governor Brown Jr. decided that utilities need to control how the energy is used instead of leaving the decisions with the end users. The utilities then viewed those guidelines as an opportunity, made it their new business model, and dreamed up myriad programs to enrich themselves. That is where deregulation came in, which was unfortunately abused by Enron mostly because there were no strings attached to energy procurement.

During that time I was employed by Enron Energy Services after my stint with PG&E. There have been other DJ columns on this topic by experts but their advice has not resonated with our legislators and our governors because of political campaign contributions and other favors. A shareholder construct is preferred as long as we have non-political oversight and we may need the Federal Energy Commission to reach into local business practices.

Are you even aware that ratepayers finance TURN and their executives? These highly compensated stool pigeons ostensibly fight against rate increases but realize that their positions rely on lame protest actions that have never been taken seriously. TURN stands for Toward Utility rate Normalization, another joke that Becker appears to be emulating. If Becker were truly serious, he would have a team of experts develop legislation to overhaul the current utility industry gravy train. It would be a long overdue comprehensive effort. Don't hold your breath.

KDM

20% of their salary? Empty threat with zero impact. Easily evaded by taking most of their pay in stock or other benefits instead of "salary". Have to agree with Dirk on this one - Becker is part of the political machine, trying to position himself as helping citizens while enabling corporations to exploit residents.

easygerd

quote: "Becker, who has tangled with the utility companies in the past in an effort to reduce skyrocketing electricity rates, said he’s expecting pushback but is hoping to keep the provision in the legislation as it works its way through the California Senate."

... and yet this is the county which produces NO cheap, renewable energy whatsoever. In 2015 San Mateo County created a full-blown, large organization called Peninsula Clean Energy to built out a local microgrid. The County is one of the most threatened counties in California as we are surrounded by rising water from two sides. We also have plenty of wind energy, basically blowing right through the peak hours of 4-9pm. And yet Josh Becker and PCE haven't even built one little windfarm, not even one wind turbine to create cheap, renewable power needed for a microgrid.

In a state where the threat of wildfires and equipment failures constantly cause power outages, where is the law that EVs MUST provide bi-directional charging?

This is all Political Theater, just like

- Becker, Papan, Mueller, and Speier's "fight on children with e-bikes" while totally ignoring drunk, distracted drivers.

- Becker's "let's buy energy from New Mexico" so SMC can keep greenwashing.

- Papan's "give me more money to fight sea level rise, while I go after bike lanes and e-bikes"

- Corzo's equity-warrior persona, while segregating San Mateo's schools AND rerouting homeless-funds to pension payments (Measure K).

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here