Editor,
I appreciate Peggy Brady’s thoughtful reply (smdailyjournal.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/more-on-san-mateo-parking/article_5eb0195f-5904-4b4b-b3dc-4a317d5526ab.html) — we agree on more than it appears.
Clear skies. Gusty winds during the evening. Low near 50F. WNW winds at 20 to 30 mph, decreasing to 10 to 15 mph. Higher wind gusts possible..
Clear skies. Gusty winds during the evening. Low near 50F. WNW winds at 20 to 30 mph, decreasing to 10 to 15 mph. Higher wind gusts possible.
Updated: June 6, 2026 @ 6:40 pm
Editor,
I appreciate Peggy Brady’s thoughtful reply (smdailyjournal.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/more-on-san-mateo-parking/article_5eb0195f-5904-4b4b-b3dc-4a317d5526ab.html) — we agree on more than it appears.
Ms. Brady notes that homebuilders build to maximize profit. Now that state law lets them choose, Gateway’s builder provided just 73 car stalls for 128 apartments. A profit-seeking builder who thought buyers wanted 2.3 cars apiece would have built more parking and charged for it; parking is revenue, not charity. They built less because they read the market next to a Caltrain station.
She calls $50,000 per stall small against a 30-year mortgage. But that’s the floor — underground parking runs higher — and it lands on buyers and renters alike, financed into the price or folded into the rent. Even at the floor, one stall adds roughly $300 a month — often the line between a young family affording to live here and not.
Ms. Brady writes from Foster City and I from San Mateo, but the affordability squeeze doesn’t stop at city limits — and we want the same thing: a county that keeps its appeal for our children and our employers. Where we differ is how. People are being priced out today, or never starting families or businesses here at all — not because of a new building near the train, but because a home costs too much. Requiring a parking space in every new apartment or condo only drives that cost higher.
Max Mautner
San Mateo
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(4) comments
Thanks for your letter, Mr. Mautner, but we know that the cost to build housing, affordable or not, is increased considerably by added fees and assessments and mandates for “green” new scam features. Unless those exorbitant costs are addressed, building housing will only become more expensive and out of reach for more people. As for developers, they’ll build whatever you want as long as they make a profit. No parking spots, no problem. Two car garages for every unit, no problem. Units with every “green” new scam feature, no problem. BTW, are there any builders who are not profit-seeking? If so, chances are they’re not around very long.
Yes, thank you Max.
Last night the San Mateo City Council received a presentation that said that many of its garages are largely unused for most of the week. Yet, taxpayers are asked to cover the high cost of construction and maintenance of these facilities. Meanwhile, local businesses are given subsidized permits to park here.
Shouldn't downtown business owners be encouraging their employees to take Caltrain or Samtrans, which both provide regular service downtown???
There is no fix as long as the state is run by democrats. It costs $150-$600 per square foot to build a home in Austin Texas and $400-$1,000 in San Mateo CA. Materials cost the same, the problem is regulatory fees, permit fees, CA State FORCED hourly labor costs, regulatory fees, green fees, green requirements, tree hugger attorney fees and impact fees. Fees, fees, fees
YIMBY politicians keep creating these loopholes that get landlords out of their duty to provide parking.
YIMBY politicians like Adam Lorraine, Amo Lee, Nicole Fernandez, Isabella Chu, Chris Sturken, Elmer Saballos, Jeff Gee, etc. oppose bike lanes for children, so their "sponsors" can then use public streets for free car storage.
- Redwood City hasn't built a useful bike lane since 2016.
- San Mateo even tried to take bike lanes down.
The parking discussion is another governmental giveaway that costs our kids the safe bike lanes they need and deserve.
Society is paying, so YIMBY-companies can make a few more bucks.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.