As California Democrats prepare for an unprecedented retaliatory redistricting effort, San Mateo County lawmaker say it’s the only option to prevent a Trump-initiated rigging of the upcoming 2026 midterms.
California’s redistricting would only kick in if other states go forward with their own midcycle redistricting policies. It will likely offer voters the option to create more Democratic House of Representatives seats in the state after Texas lawmakers first made plans to do the same in favor of Republicans.
“We’ve got to fight fire with fire,” state Sen. Josh Becker, D-Menlo Park, said. “We can’t just sit back and let them try to rig the system. It’s disheartening they would do this, but we’ve got to fight fire with fire.”
The gerrymandering tit-for-tat began with a Texas effort to change its own state district maps to add five additional Republican House of Representative seats, an effort that is currently ongoing and only requires approval by the Texas Legislature, not voter consent.
The Texas redistricting was intentionally designed to illegally ensure the House remains in Republican control and unable to check President Trump’s unprecedented consolidation of power, Democrats are arguing.
U.S. Rep. Kevin Mullin, D-South San Francisco, said he was supportive of a short-term retaliative effort in California to counter Trump’s plans, but that national redistricting reform was necessary in the long term to prevent future problems.
“I fully support what’s going to be going to the ballot in special elections, so we can counter this attack on democracy. But we all understand that this is a temporary move, to counter what the president is calling for in Republican states,” Mullin said “Over the long haul, we need to try to enact national redistricting reform, because this political civil war is not sustainable.”
It’s been Democrats, not Republicans, who’ve supported redistricting reform to eliminate gerrymandering in the past, Mullin said, but argued that the times were so drastic they required dramatic, last-ditch efforts.
“I know my Democratic constituents want us to be fighting with every tool in our toolbox, and in [this] case, that is about winning a special election so we can counter what is coming from this president,” he said.
If California voters pass it in November, the plan would override California’s independent citizen commission — which decides how district lines are drawn — and redraw new maps more favorable to Democrats until 2030.
State legislators will vote on whether to send the new maps to California voters before Aug. 22. Given a Democratic supermajority in both chambers, it’s unlikely such legislation would fail in a floor vote — however, Republicans recently have sued in court to stop the new maps, an effort that’s still ongoing.
In a statement, Assemblymember Marc Berman, D-Palo Alto, reiterated that now was the time for California to fight back.
“Donald Trump has unapologetically targeted California time and again over the past six months — targeting workers who power our economy, targeting California’s best in the world UC system. … Trump and Republicans now want to rig our democracy to guarantee they remain in power,” Berman said. “We did not choose this fight, we do not want this fight, but with our democracy on the line, California cannot run away from this fight.”
U.S. Rep. Sam Liccardo, D-San Jose, also summed it up succinctly in a statement.
“This is a necessary but temporary response to an authoritarian takeover of our electoral system,” he said. “While we’d all prefer other means, we cannot take a knife to a gunfight.”
(7) comments
Until 60 senate seats are obtained by either party no cause for concern. When I was raised a few sayings I would hear come to mind: Two wrongs don't make a right, If everyone was jumping off the Golden Gate Bridge would you? If you don't have anything nice to say don't say it, and that the bed you made so lay in it.
This is not the time to take a moral high ground. If this is the game Republicans want to play, let's play. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
ILikePi - no morals here. Pure corruption on the part of the California Democrats. How is it possible that Republican voters are severely underrepresented in DC? What happens in Texas should not have any impact on what we do in California. Newsom and his gang are the slimy ones here. Even a real Democrat should be wondering.
I think you just made my point for me. Please, tell me when is the time for the moral high ground? The excuse you offer could be used for any and all reprehensible behavior - and it is, but we call the other side out for those acts. Want to wear it like Trump does?
California delivers 52 House Representatives but only 9 are Republican. For a State that is 40% Red, why would the Democrats even force even less Republican representation? Their screaming for a democratic process is more than hollow and Newsom should be carted out of town. Hypocrisy at its best.
If voters believe what is happening in Texas is illegal (it appears not to be) and/or immoral or void of a standard of ethics, then it it is impossible for California to violate the constitution of this state by this workaround being proposed, without being 100% hypocritical. You can't call out another for doing what you are about to do. Further, if one looks at the map of the US, there are more red states who could do this to get control of the seats needed to keep control of congress. This is a very bad idea, but perfectly in line with Gavin's goal of trying to win in 2028. I don't think he is owed that by the voters (and I also believe he will lose, putting Vance in for eight years).
Hilarious how Democrats are falling all over themselves trying to explain why they’re a threat to democracy in countering a supposed threat to democracy from Trump which has never materialized. I fully expect the anti-democratic actions from Dems to be challenged in court although judge-shopping is a big thing with Democrats and we can’t count on judges to enforce our laws. As such, let’s slow walk the appeals until we reach the Supreme Court, after which time it may be too late. Meanwhile, let’s hope all states gerrymander and see what shakes out. Most blue states are almost gerrymandered out so big gains for red states would be my guess.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.