BCN-20200520-SALESFORCETRANSITCENTER1.jpg

Salesforce Transit Center, as envisioned with Caltrain and high-speed rail terminals below ground.

The California High Speed Rail Authority’s recent financial projections on the San Francisco to Los Angeles County rail connection could leverage more of Caltrain’s infrastructure, accelerating the need to secure funding for several grade separation projects along the Peninsula.

While a high-speed rail connection in Central Valley is already in the works, a recent HSR report highlighted the strong financial viability of connecting San Jose to Gilroy using Caltrain infrastructure. Because of the existing rail connection between San Francisco and San Jose, connecting the latter with Gilroy could then allow for a subsequent connection to Bakersfield and ultimately Palmdale in Los Angeles County. The report put estimates for such a connection around $87 billion and would be operational in 2038.

Recommended for you

alyse@smdailyjournal.com

(650) 344-5200 ext. 102

Recommended for you

(5) comments

Dirk van Ulden

If there is anything these estimators are good at, is low balling. This may under the direction of our oblivious politicians. Has anyone ever seen a project come in under budget? This is all designed to fool the voters, so whatever you believe, don't vote for any bond or other funding measures because they will come for more once, surprise, the estimate came in too low.

easygerd

Going the SF route was always a flawed project, since SF is basically a Dead End.

The project should have used the Amtrak/UP tracks going to Oakland and improving the connection between OAK and SF with BART instead. HSR could even just end in San Jose - and then have BART or CALTRAIN make the connections to OAK and SF. This would prevent a lot of headaches and cost.

But eventually they want the SF project because then they can waste more money on a tunnel with little to no RCO. In that case suddenly you have two agencies competing for ridership with HSR and BART instead of two system complementing each other.

Rajiv

It's not a "dead end," it's where people are trying to get to. Ending in Oakland or San Jose wouldn't make sense when a plurality or even majority of riders want to reach SF.

easygerd

In train speech it's a "Terminal Station" or dead end until there is a very expensive tunnel crossing the Bay towards Sacramento.

I don't think a plurality of riders wants to get to SF - it's a really small city with little to offer to people coming from LA. Maybe a few tourists, but most likely it's going to be businesses or maybe commuters using this.

And those riders want to get to San Jose and the Silicon Valley companies around it.

If the HSR makes too many stops in SJ, PA, RWC, SFO, SF - it's not going to be that high-speed anymore so it can only stop at maybe two important locations.

And Caltrain can't get the tunnel to SF transbay terminal going either. In which case the HSR is better off ending at SFO then at King and 4th.

Either way it's a lot of money San Mateo County needs to invest in order to watch HSR just speeding by.

Much cheaper scenario: SJ to OAK to Sacramento as that corridor exists already.

- one set of riders can take Caltrain from San Jose to Silicon Valley and can get out at any stop along the way, even SFO.

- another set of riders can take BART from Oakland to San Francisco and even SFO.

That makes good use of all systems and would avoid a lot of cost for grade separations that will never come and a tunnel that will be unpayable by the time they start planning.

Terence Y

Folks, don’t fall for this sob story pushed by transit officials. This is another article laying the way for another set of tax measures to take more of your hard-earned money to subsidize union workers in paying their ever-increasing salaries, pensions, and benefits. Vote NO on any tax measures looking to support transit or train-to-nowhere infrastructure.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here