Editor,

It should be said:

Recommended for you

Recommended for you

(4) comments

Seema

Who are the 10 resident leaders that the author references in this LTE and her public comment? What neighborhoods are they from? What neighborhood outreach did they engage in before meeting with staff as representatives of the neighborhoods?

Between the May 5 Sustainability and Infrastructure Commission meeting and September 15 City Council meeting there were 11 unique individuals who expressed concerns or opposition to this project, via written or live comment. There were 26 unique individuals who expressed support, all of whom mentioned being a San Mateo resident who lives near the project or a commuter who uses the project corridor to get to school or work.

Michael Regan, speaking on behalf of the Beresford Hillsdale Neighborhood Association, implored staff to "listen to citizens that live in the community, people who live there and have to drive every day." He also asked staff to "work with the group [of 10], they have excellent ideas, we have an excellent Public Works department, the two of them can come to an agreement that we can be proud of."

I partially agree with his first statement, that it's important for the city to listen to residents who live near the project corridor. But I disagree that the city should only consider input from residents that have to drive every day. It's important to listen to ALL residents.

And I'm troubled that the president of a neighborhood association in a different part of the town is encouraging staff to make changes to the project to come to an agreement with an anonymous group of 10 individuals. Governance should be transparent and serve the needs of all residents, especially when we're discussing how over $27M of funding will be spent.

joebob91

"Put residents first" (as long as they own cars).

Taso

Well said Lisa Taner. Well said indeed.

Terence Y

Thanks for your letter, Ms. Taner. I posit that many of these bike lane projects are to reward union labor. These union workers get paid to construct bike lanes and then get paid again to remove them – as what occurred in Humboldt. As long as union workers are rewarded, they don’t care who foots the bill.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here