Editor,

Lately, there has been a lot of discussion — via flyers, letters, and TV ads — about redistricting in both Texas and California. One key difference between the two states, however, seems to be missing from the conversation.

Recommended for you

Recommended for you

(5) comments

Rscollins

Excellent point, and one I have been making myself.

Ariolimax

Bill Surraco’s letter oversimplifies the distinction between direct democracy, where citizens vote directly on issues like California’s proposed redistricting map, and a representative democratic republic, where elected officials, as in Texas, make such decisions on voters’ behalf. Both systems are democratic. Ironically, California’s Proposition 50, which Surraco’s view supports, would suspend this direct democratic process until 2031, ceding control and limiting voter input. Perhaps permanently. How can one reconcile championing voter input while endorsing a measure that silences it? California Democrats are already out of touch the average voter, and this proposition will make matters worse, not better for the party locally and nationally.

Terence Y

Nice try, Mr. Surraco, on repeating Democrat talking points to irrationally rationalize the threat to democracy known as Proposition 50. Unfortunately and as usual with Democrat talking points, they’re false and easily debunked. The true contrast is that everyone (even the ones who’d like to conveniently forget) knows there is a difference between Newsom’s antics and Texas’s redistricting. Texas lawmakers are pursuing new congressional maps following a directive from the DOJ asserting that current maps violate civil rights laws. There’s no such directive to California. If we truly care about democratic participation, this contrast deserves more attention.

Now that wannabe dictator Newsom has started a redistricting war, I believe Missouri is attempting to finalize their efforts to replace a Democrat seat with a Republican one. We can only hope all red states will retaliate against California’s retaliation. Have a Trump-tastic day!

Rscollins

And from where did that directive from the DOJ originate? We both know the answer. Mr. Surrraco is spot on. We are asking the voters to approve a new redistricting map; Texas isn’t. It’s that simple. And btw, I don’t like the idea of this proposition, but if it’s not done there will eventually be no opposition party in Congress, or just a token one. But hey, maybe that’s the goal.

Terence Y

Speaking of simple, Rscollins, Texas doesn’t need to ask voters to approve a new redistricting map because their redistricting is based upon a directive from the DOJ. Which you readily admit. Where is a directive from the DOJ that California is violating civil rights laws? There isn’t and yet Newsom and Democrats are attempting to irrationally rationalize sacrificing the opposition party in California in the name of party over people. But hey, maybe that’s the goal. Hypocrisy abounds. Since wannabe dictator Newsom started the redistricting ware, we can only hope all red states will retaliate against California’s retaliation. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here