Journalism and the First Amendment

Don't shoot the messenger. I'm just repeating what the AI written by right-wing tech bros is telling us.

And the right-wing AI seems to recognize the brotherhood. They think TBot is pro-Russian and there to sow misinformation.

I would agree. I mean no one that is pro-Trump would repeatedly dive into the discussion about teenagers and their gender identity knowing fully well about the Epstein files and what they mean to Trump, Melania, RFK, Bannon, Musk, Miller. Right now these guys want to stay as far away as humanly possible from teenagers and sex-related topics.

If you want to sow distrust, it's a real stroke of genius to keep harping on a problem that isn't really one just to keep the Epstein files burning on everyone's minds. I mean Stephen Colbert from the Colbert Report couldn't have done it any better.

But back to what the right-wing AI had to say:

"The text employs common rhetorical strategies found in online disinformation and polarized political discussions, but not exclusively linked to one source.

Targeting mainstream media and anonymous sourcing: The first part of the text focuses on delegitimizing mainstream media and using anonymous sources to "create rumors." This tactic is a CLASSIC DISINFORMATION method to sow distrust and discredit reliable sources.

Attacking specific sources: The text singles out Wikipedia as an untrustworthy, "biased" or "fake news" source. This TACTIC is used to DISMISS INFORMATION that contradicts a predetermined narrative, regardless of the source's actual credibility.

The "firehose of falsehood" approach: The tactic of flooding the information space with conflicting messages to create uncertainty is a known characteristic of some propaganda campaigns. While this text is not a flood itself, the style of attacking multiple sources ("mainstream media," "Wikipedia," and "any other fake news source") is consistent with this tactic. "

PS.: And if I'm known for anything please let it be BIKE LANES. SMPool can have the biological men/women thing. That's too complicated for me.

eGerd – TBot here. Don’t shoot the messenger. Perhaps you don’t realize, but AI, like people, is known to have hallucinations. You can’t believe everything AI tells you. For instance, if AI cites Wikipedia, you may as well question the result. What’s the old saying, “Garbage in, garbage out”? Weren’t Wikipedia editors attempting to delete the murder of Iryna Zarutska and the alleged attacker’s name? PS: As long as you don’t call out the cheating in the biological men/women thing, we’ll wonder whether “fair play” is ever in play. And no need to worry. I won’t forget your pet issue in advocating for bike lanes.

Fabulous, you are doing it again. Talking about teenage sex topics leads everyone's thought right back to Epstein, QAnon, Trump, Melania, Musk, RFK, Bannon, Matt Gaetz and all the others allegedly taking the Lolita Express to the forbidden Island where pedophilia wasn't just tolerated, it was endorsed.

All these topics Republicans care about - teenage abortion, high school gender confusion, college gender athletics, it's all about the thought process of dirty old men. It's an open celebration of pedophilia.

If you really want to protect the biological woman and her safety, join me in supporting separated bike lanes so the biological woman can be safe from the vehicular violence brought to them by the much stronger and more ruthless biological man.