To paraphrase on old saying, the chaos will continue until morale improves.

The San Mateo County Board of Supervisors, finally having fired Sheriff Christina Corpus, decided Tuesday night that it will appoint a new sheriff, who will serve out the remainder of a term that runs through 2028. The vote was 3-2, with supervisors David Canepa and Jackie Speier dissenting in substantially different ways.

Recommended for you

Mark Simon is a veteran journalist, whose career included 15 years as an executive at SamTrans and Caltrain. He can be reached at marksimon@smdailyjournal.com.

Recommended for you

(3) comments

easygerd

Some said from the beginning, that all the very typical trumped-up, salacious charges against a female sheriff were only a ruse so the 'Good Old Boys' network can bring back their favorite candidate and former sheriff.

Let's see if they were right or left ....

Terence Y

eGerd – TBot here. Apparently those trumped-up, salacious charges were convincing enough for voters and the board to oust Corpus. Perhaps voters didn’t like the ‘Good Old Girls’ network. The recent past has shown that the ‘Good Old Boys’ network was the way to go. That result would have saved taxpayers definite $millions of wasted taxpayer money and as yet untold $millions of wasted taxpayer money to pay settlements from the ‘Good Old Girls’ network. $millions, BTW, that could have been wasted on your and joebob91’s pet issue of bicycle infrastructure.

Terence Y

Thanks, Mr. Simon, for your ongoing episode recaps of the “As the Sheriff’s World Turns” soap opera. Even though the SMC-BOS is appointing a new sheriff, wouldn’t residents be able to place another measure or initiative to remove the sheriff if they’re not happy with the selection? Or would folks need to recall the BOS member(s) who agreed with the appointment? I don’t believe there’s an issue with getting the public to weigh in, but ultimately, is this only for show to claim public input was listened to, while BOS members will go along their merry little way with a backroom deal based on “inside” influence? Ultimately, if the new Sheriff isn’t going to support ICE operations to remove criminals and terrorists from our community, then are we in much of a different boat than before? Regardless, I look forward to your columns in the near future – perhaps a few “special edition” columns due to the shortened length of upcoming activities? As always, they’d be appreciated.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here