An early-stage effort to extend the Highway 101 express lanes north of Interstate 380 is facing a slight delay, with the current phase expected to be completed in 2027.
The current express lanes, which opened about three years ago, stretches 22 miles on Highway 101 from the Santa Clara County line to Interstate 380. Starting around 2020, the San Mateo County Transportation Authority began conducting research on expanding the project north of the interstate, either by converting an existing lane into an express lane or constructing a brand-new one.
The initiative is in the environmental and preliminary design phase, which began in 2020 and is a multiyear effort now expected to be completed in summer 2027, though earlier plans hoped to complete the current stage by this year.
“Almost all of the technical and environmental studies are complete at this point. We are still finalizing the traffic analysis, but we have made progress,” said Director of Project Delivery Jessica Manzi during a board meeting March 5. “We do anticipate traffic studies being complete in May of this year so that we can plan to circulate the draft environmental document at the end of this year and complete the document and project report in the summer of 2027.”
Many transit advocates have opposed the plan, especially a version that would widen the highway by constructing a new lane. And the board is facing more pressure to get data illustrating that the current express lanes have in fact reduced congestion, as the agency has touted less traffic and more carpooling and transit use as primary goals of the initiative.
Recommended for you
Board Member Carlos Romero said he still supports finalizing the early-stage study process, though wouldn't support moving further along on the project until there is a clearer sense of whether the current express lanes are actually decreasing congestion.
"I would hope that we could have additional information, additional analysis on the performance side of the 101 managed lanes that could inform whether or not we're moving these metrics on vehicle miles traveled and on [greenhouse gas emissions]," he said. “I think that is part of what should be in our calculus when we think about moving forward on this project."
The current phase has an $10 million expected cost, and previous estimates on the total construction costs for the express lanes expansion could range from $250 million to $350 million. The current timeline estimates that the project could complete construction by 2032 if the plan moves ahead.
The board is expected to receive a formal performance evaluation of the existing express lanes in April, and another update on the express lane project will go before the board by the end of this year.
I don’t know if Kalshi or Polymarket has any odds on this project moving forward but I’m 100% sure this project will move forward regardless of whichever plan is proposed and regardless of any traffic study. Why? Because it’s another union transportation labor giveaway to the tune of another $350 million in taxpayer funds, regardless of whether the make-work project makes any difference to global warming (it won’t). As usual, it’s a loss for taxpayers but that doesn’t matter, as long as ever-increasing union transportation salaries, pensions, and benefits are paid. Don’t worry. You’ll see more transportation tax proposals, again and again asking to transfer more of your hard earned money to union workers.
TBot, You are correct on three of three counts here.
1. I'm glad we finally agree that car projects are "as usual, a loss for taxpayers".
2. This project will make no "difference on global warming" - the opposite is true.
3. This project is about sabotaging ridership and then asking for a new tax measure to "save Public Transportation".
Rico E. Medina, Jeff Gee, Diane Papan, and Josh Becker will be the loudest crying that we need to "save Caltrain" and "for the children" ... while bring more air pollution to those children in SSF.
Thank you, Carlos Romero, for your support of data based decision making on these very expensive decisions. Previous highway widening projects have simply resulted in more cars on the road and more delays, especially on local streets.
As long as car-people like Jessica Manzi - she who never built a useful bike lane in Redwood City - are allowed to get their faked Environmental Impact Reports approved by "sponsored" Democrats on the SMCTA board (currently Julia Mates, Mark Nagales, Anders Fung, Rico E. Medina, Noelia Corzo, Carlos Romero, and Ray Mueller), the air pollution for SSF residents will be going up not down.
The 22 miles of "Equity HOT Lanes" have become a failure. It didn't solve congestion, it increased air pollution for Equity Focus Areas in San Mateo, Redwood City and East Palo Alto. This extension will do the same for SSF. And society is paying the price in higher health care cost, so a few tech bros can pay for a faster commute on these Lexus Lanes.
There is no real income coming in, as all revenue is going straight to enforcement. Apparently an estimated 40-60% of HOT-lane users are car-pool cheaters.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(4) comments
I don’t know if Kalshi or Polymarket has any odds on this project moving forward but I’m 100% sure this project will move forward regardless of whichever plan is proposed and regardless of any traffic study. Why? Because it’s another union transportation labor giveaway to the tune of another $350 million in taxpayer funds, regardless of whether the make-work project makes any difference to global warming (it won’t). As usual, it’s a loss for taxpayers but that doesn’t matter, as long as ever-increasing union transportation salaries, pensions, and benefits are paid. Don’t worry. You’ll see more transportation tax proposals, again and again asking to transfer more of your hard earned money to union workers.
TBot, You are correct on three of three counts here.
1. I'm glad we finally agree that car projects are "as usual, a loss for taxpayers".
2. This project will make no "difference on global warming" - the opposite is true.
3. This project is about sabotaging ridership and then asking for a new tax measure to "save Public Transportation".
Rico E. Medina, Jeff Gee, Diane Papan, and Josh Becker will be the loudest crying that we need to "save Caltrain" and "for the children" ... while bring more air pollution to those children in SSF.
Thank you, Carlos Romero, for your support of data based decision making on these very expensive decisions. Previous highway widening projects have simply resulted in more cars on the road and more delays, especially on local streets.
Alyse gave us that answer last week:
https://www.smdailyjournal.com/news/local/early-stage-of-express-lane-project-extended/article_575fd0ea-ebd7-4e0c-b54b-72f668be68f6.html
As long as car-people like Jessica Manzi - she who never built a useful bike lane in Redwood City - are allowed to get their faked Environmental Impact Reports approved by "sponsored" Democrats on the SMCTA board (currently Julia Mates, Mark Nagales, Anders Fung, Rico E. Medina, Noelia Corzo, Carlos Romero, and Ray Mueller), the air pollution for SSF residents will be going up not down.
The 22 miles of "Equity HOT Lanes" have become a failure. It didn't solve congestion, it increased air pollution for Equity Focus Areas in San Mateo, Redwood City and East Palo Alto. This extension will do the same for SSF. And society is paying the price in higher health care cost, so a few tech bros can pay for a faster commute on these Lexus Lanes.
There is no real income coming in, as all revenue is going straight to enforcement. Apparently an estimated 40-60% of HOT-lane users are car-pool cheaters.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.