With substantial housing planned in Belmont along El Camino Real, officials are hoping a long-term plan to revitalize the corridor will include safety improvements and enhanced flow of traffic.
State Route 82, or El Camino Real, serves as a main road spanning the entire county north to south, but improving the often-dangerous walking and biking conditions is notoriously difficult, given it falls under state, not local, jurisdiction.
Planned improvements along the Belmont stretch of El Camino Real is part of a project known as the Central El Camino Real Multimodal Plan, which would also include San Mateo, San Carlos and Redwood City. The improvements range from less-resource-intensive projects to more capital-intensive initiatives, though the agency is still in the early stages of identifying all the projects that will be included in the plan.
Mayor Julia Mates said during a City Council meeting Sept. 9, that with an increase in housing development along El Camino Real, the plan should prioritize safety for nearby residents.
“We have less control over our land use now, but we should all be in agreement that given the fact the state is mandating so much of the housing be along transit corridors, and El Camino Real is one of those … safety is a priority,” Mates said.
The multimodal plan is one of the projects under the Grand Boulevard Initiative, a nearly 20-year-old effort that includes ECR improvements throughout the entire county. But the Grand Boulevard project has undergone its own twists and turns. The initiative was once focused on housing and land use along the corridor but, with stricter housing mandates from the state, SamTrans recently pivoted to focus more on transit-related projects, though minimal funding has been secured beyond feasibility studies.
Councilmember Gina Latimerlo said she hoped to see better traffic with the upgrades.
“I would love a place for buses to stop that do not interrupt the flow of traffic and do not put people in dangerous situations,” Latimerlo said.
The entire Grand Boulevard Initiative, which includes about 22 miles of redesign, could take up to a decade to complete. SamTrans hopes to finalize the cost, construction schedule and secure necessary funds for the multimodal plan — from San Mateo to Redwood City — by 2026.
(1) comment
quote 1: "Grand Boulevard Initiative, a nearly 20-year-old effort" to bring multimodal transportation to El Camino Real.
Let that quote sink in.
San Mateo Democrats have for 20 years worked hard on bringing bike lanes to ECR - and so far: ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.
quote 2: "minimal funding has been secured"
The second quote isn't much better, it's also wrong. SMC has already spent millions on this project with no results whatsoever.
SMCTA rewarded project after project with millions in bike funding to create "studies", "research", "outreach", "paper pilots", "one-day quick builds" for photo-ops, but basically nothing useful at all.
In 20 years, not one city in this county has built a real, useful bike lane on their part of the "Grand Boulevard". Not even one section of the King's Highway could be called a "Complete Street".
Let's not forget this is the YIMBY high-density wet dream and they have neither managed to get bike lanes nor bus lanes here - the only two useful, high-density transportation options for this area.
The Grand Boulevard Initiative - led by Emily Beach - has been used by San Mateo Democrats to burn through as much bicycle funding as possible, so it couldn't be used for anything useful like Safe-Routes-To-School.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.