Irv Brenner (June 2) and Neil Wild (May 27) raise important points about California voting, but neither mentions the biggest problem with our vote-by-mail system: It enables voters to prove how they have voted — ending the secret ballot, which made both coercion and vote-selling impossible.
With vote-by-mail, an abusive manager, spouse or union steward can — with threat of violence — demand to see your ballot, or demand that you hand over your signed blank ballot.
Similarly, vote-by-mail makes it easy to sell your vote as a signed blank ballot. We will soon have exact numbers, but Tom Steyer seems poised to spend more than $200 million for less than 2 million votes — more than $100 per vote. Would you hand over a signed blank ballot for, say, $50? What if you support the candidate or are indifferent?
You might argue that these hypotheticals never occur, but how would you know? The parties involved have good reason to keep the activity secret.
In his classic work “The Strategy of Conflict,” Thomas Schelling wrote that “political democracy itself depends ... on the mandatory secrecy” of the vote. Previous generations understood this, and set a high bar for “absentee” voting. Alas, the lesson is forgotten.
Jonathan - our voting system is subject to almost innumerable opportunities for manipulation. Your attention to coerced voting using the paper ballot is another twist that I had not even contemplated. If we can't have secret balloting, the whole system is a joke. During the Covid 19 era, we were even instructed in the vote centers to waive signature and some address verification. Needless to say, voter ID was already discarded. Until we have a top to bottom review of the entire process by an apolitical institution, we might as well accept the status quo, fraud and discrepancies on steroids and we are stuck with the same predictable election outcomes .
In the 2016 Burlingame election, Measure R for rent stabilization, we had reports from tenants that landlords threatened them with eviction if Measure R won. These kinds of threats have been with us since politics were invented.
Jonathan - Now now, the democrats would never stoop to that level of paying or buying a vote. Oh wait they probably have and are well funded with George Soros & Son and billionaire Neville Roy Singham writing the checks. These two America hating communists have been shown to be the funding behind the Chicago, Portland, LA etc... riots.
Great observation, CA Is Burning. Let’s not forget the SPLC funding KKK groups that the SPLC is purportedly fighting against. Talk about manufacturing a crisis. It’s akin to firefighters funding arsonists to start fires or police organizations funding criminals to commit crimes. Billionaires aren’t the only ones funding violence against the American people. The SPLC is using donations to do the same.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(4) comments
Jonathan - our voting system is subject to almost innumerable opportunities for manipulation. Your attention to coerced voting using the paper ballot is another twist that I had not even contemplated. If we can't have secret balloting, the whole system is a joke. During the Covid 19 era, we were even instructed in the vote centers to waive signature and some address verification. Needless to say, voter ID was already discarded. Until we have a top to bottom review of the entire process by an apolitical institution, we might as well accept the status quo, fraud and discrepancies on steroids and we are stuck with the same predictable election outcomes .
In the 2016 Burlingame election, Measure R for rent stabilization, we had reports from tenants that landlords threatened them with eviction if Measure R won. These kinds of threats have been with us since politics were invented.
Jonathan - Now now, the democrats would never stoop to that level of paying or buying a vote. Oh wait they probably have and are well funded with George Soros & Son and billionaire Neville Roy Singham writing the checks. These two America hating communists have been shown to be the funding behind the Chicago, Portland, LA etc... riots.
Great observation, CA Is Burning. Let’s not forget the SPLC funding KKK groups that the SPLC is purportedly fighting against. Talk about manufacturing a crisis. It’s akin to firefighters funding arsonists to start fires or police organizations funding criminals to commit crimes. Billionaires aren’t the only ones funding violence against the American people. The SPLC is using donations to do the same.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.