Friday
November
20
2009
6:39 pm
Weather
 
  Home
  Local News
  State / National / World
  Sports
  Opinion / Letters
  Business
  Arts / Entertainment
  Lifestyle
  Obituaries
  Calendar
  Special
  Submit Event
  Comics / Games
  Classifieds
  DJ Designers
  Community Forum
  Archives
  Advertise With Us
  About Us

Do you Facebook? Become a fan of the Daily Journal. Click here.

Follow us on Twitter!

Advertise in the ONLY locally-owned daily newspaper in San Mateo County.

County set to recoup $21M
November 03, 2009, 02:42 AM By Michelle Durand

San Mateo County will recoup more than $21 million for its general fund and special districts by participating in a statewide plan for jurisdictions facing money grabs by the state to balance its budget.

As the Nov. 6 deadline to commit approaches, the Board of Supervisors is scheduled Tuesday morning to approve participation in the Proposition 1A Securitization Program. A number of other San Mateo County cities have already committed. The county’s participation is on behalf of itself, the fire protection fund and a number of special districts for which it acts as the governing board.

The estimated funds for the county general fund is $20.7 million, the County Protection Fund is $399,797 and the special districts is approximately $558,249 — a total of $21,656,529.

If the county does not participate in the program, it will not recoup the money taken from the state — along with 2 percent interest — until 2013.

Although Proposition 1A safeguards local property and sales tax, the budget package signed by the governor suspends it because of fiscal necessity and allows the state to borrow 8 percent of that revenue. Rather than wait and scrape by with less revenue, affected cities, counties and districts can participate in the securitization program offered by joint powers authority California Communities. The JPA  issues bonds to participants. The state then repays the bondholders, giving the local cities and counties immediate cash.

Agencies will receive half the proceeds Jan. 15 and the other half May 3, according to the League of California Cities.

County Budget Director Jim Saco previously said the main question for the county about participation is if officials felt they  can do better than 2 percent interest with the money in hand.

The county is not at any risk by participating because all financing costs are borne by the state, the county has no obligation on the bonds and is held harmless if the state does not repay the loans.

 

Michelle Durand can be reached by e-mail: michelle@smdailyjournal.com or by phone: (650) 344-5200 ext. 102.  


Info box: The San Mateo County Board of Supervisors meets 9 a.m. Tuesday, Nov. 3 in Board Chambers, 400 County Government Center.


Email to Friend Send a Letter to the Editor  |  Email to Friend Post your comment  |  Email to Friend Email to Friend  |  Print this Page Print this Page
<< Back
 
  RSS feed RSS
Daily Journal Quick Poll
 
What is the best new phrase of the year now recognized by the New Oxford American Dictionary?

Unfriend: To remove someone as a friend (on a social networking site)
Intexticated: Distracted while texting and driving
Tramp stamp: A tattoo on the lower back, usually on a woman
Funemployed: People taking advantage of newly unemployed status to have fun
Sexting: Sending of sexually explicit messages and pictures by cellphone
 
 
  
UC Berkeley students protest student fee hike
BERKELEY — University of California Berkeley students protesting a 32 percent increase in student fe..
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
©2009 Daily Journal - San Mateo County's homepage